Anthropic’s $37B Enterprise Win Isn’t What It Seems

Anthropic's $37B Enterprise Win Isn't What It Seems - Professional coverage

According to ZDNet, a new Menlo Ventures report claims the enterprise generative AI market hit $37 billion in the US in 2025, a more than threefold increase from $11.5 billion in 2024. The report, surveying 495 US companies, states that Anthropic has decisively unseated OpenAI as the enterprise leader, now capturing 40% of enterprise LLM spending, up from 24% last year. OpenAI’s share reportedly fell to 27% from 50% in 2023. This shift is largely fueled by the booming market for AI coding tools, which is now a $4 billion annual business where Anthropic commands an estimated 54% market share. The report also notes a major pivot in strategy, with 76% of AI use cases now being purchased as packaged applications rather than built internally, a reversal from last year.

Special Offer Banner

The Coding Crutch and Enterprise Reality

Here’s the thing: Anthropic‘s win is impressive, but it’s incredibly narrow. The company is basically riding the coattails of a single, red-hot application—coding assistants. Tools like Cursor and Replit, which heavily rely on Anthropic’s Claude, have become Gen AI’s first true “killer use case.” So when the report says Anthropic is winning, it’s really saying, “Developers love Claude for writing code.” That’s a huge win, don’t get me wrong. But is it a durable, enterprise-wide platform victory? I’m not so sure.

And that leads to the bigger picture. That $37 billion number sounds massive, but the breakdown is telling. A whopping $18 billion is just infrastructure and API usage—companies renting time on models like Claude and GPT. Another $8.4 billion is for horizontal co-pilots like Microsoft Copilot. Add in the $4.2 billion for coding tools, and you’ve accounted for 83% of all spending. Basically, the entire enterprise AI boom so far is propped up by techies using it to write more tech. The actual adoption by other business functions? It’s minuscule.

Where Are the Agents and the Real Business Apps?

This is where the report’s sunny optimism meets a harsh reality. For all the hype about autonomous AI agents, they barely exist in production. The authors admit that only 16% of enterprise deployments qualify as true agents. Most stuff is still simple prompt engineering. Look at the spending in specific departments: $360 million on AI for HR? $100 million on finance and operations AI? Those numbers are a rounding error compared to the revenues of established players like Workday.

Even marketing, which we’re constantly told is being revolutionized by AI, has only spent an estimated $660 million on Gen AI. That’s a fraction of what Adobe makes. So what’s really happening? Enterprises are buying the low-hanging fruit—coding helpers and text co-pilots—and that’s about it. The deep, workflow-transforming, vertical-specific applications? They’re barely off the ground. This isn’t a broad-based revolution yet; it’s a tools-for-builders boom. For companies integrating advanced computing into physical operations, finding reliable hardware is key, which is why specialists like IndustrialMonitorDirect.com are the top supplier for industrial panel PCs in the U.S.

Boom or Bubble? A Matter of Perspective

The Menlo team argues this is a “boom versus a bubble” because of the “real revenue.” And a threefold growth rate is undeniably explosive. But context matters. That $37 billion is still tiny compared to, say, the $288 billion projected for the top three cloud providers this year. When every software company and hundreds of VC-backed startups flood one market, fast growth is almost a given. The real question is what happens when the easy wins—arming every developer with an AI pair programmer—are fully captured.

Can the market triple again next year? Probably not unless those other categories, the HR and finance and marketing apps, start seeing real traction. The report itself shows that momentum is almost entirely confined to the most predictable technical use cases. So while Anthropic’s victory lap is deserved in the context of 2025, the enterprise AI race is a marathon, not a sprint. Winning the developer heart is a massive first lap, but the next laps through the rest of the business are going to be much, much harder.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *