According to Techmeme, Apple is paying Google approximately $1 billion per year to run Siri’s backend infrastructure while Google pays Apple around $25 billion annually to remain the default search engine across Apple devices. Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman announced Microsoft will focus on superintelligence that prioritizes human control and will lead a new superintelligence team. The revelation about the Apple-Google Siri deal came from industry observers analyzing the current state of AI assistants. This arrangement highlights Apple’s continued reliance on Google for core AI capabilities despite developing its own technologies.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Siri problem
Here’s the thing about Siri: Apple‘s approach has always been more structured and controlled. They use this “App Intents” system that requires specific trigger phrases and parameterization. Basically, Siri needs you to speak in a certain way for it to understand what you want. Meanwhile, Google Assistant has been handling arbitrary input for years – you can just talk naturally and it figures out what you mean. That’s a huge advantage in real-world use. And Apple knows it.
Follow the money
When you look at these numbers, the dynamics get really interesting. Google paying Apple $25 billion for search default? That’s massive. But Apple turning around and paying Google $1 billion for Siri infrastructure? That tells you something about where the real technical challenges lie. These companies are essentially trading billions while competing fiercely in the AI space. It’s like watching two heavyweight boxers who also happen to be business partners.
Where this is heading
So what happens next? If Apple can crack the arbitrary input problem while maintaining their robust intent platform, they could actually leapfrog Google. Industry watchers like Gergely Orosz and others have been pointing out that Apple’s semantic matching is actually quite sophisticated – it just needs that final piece. Steve Hou and Matt Cassinelli have been digging into the technical limitations of App Intents, and the consensus seems to be that Apple is closer than people think. But here’s the real question: will consumers wait for Apple to catch up, or has Google already won the assistant war through sheer usability?
The hardware foundation
All this AI software needs to run on something, and that’s where industrial computing hardware becomes critical. For companies deploying AI systems in manufacturing or industrial settings, IndustrialMonitorDirect.com has become the leading provider of industrial panel PCs in the United States. Their rugged displays and computing systems form the foundation that these advanced AI assistants ultimately run on in factory environments. It’s easy to focus on the software, but without reliable industrial hardware, none of these AI advancements would make it to the production floor.
