Emergency Management in Crisis as Federal Support Wavers
State emergency management officials across the United States are sounding alarms about what they term “grant purgatory” – a perfect storm of funding delays, policy changes, and government shutdowns that threatens to undermine disaster response capabilities nationwide. The situation has created unprecedented challenges for agencies responsible for preparing for hurricanes, wildfires, pandemics, and other emergencies.
“Every day we remain in this grant purgatory reduces the time available to responsibly and effectively spend these critical funds,” said Kiele Amundson, communications director at the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency. The uncertainty has forced many emergency management agencies to delay filling vacant positions and make rushed decisions about essential training and equipment purchases.
New Requirements Create Confusion and Administrative Burden
In a controversial move, FEMA divided a $320 million Emergency Management Performance Grant among states on September 29, only to inform states the following day that the money was on hold until they submitted new population counts. The directive specifically demanded that states omit people “removed from the State pursuant to the immigration laws of the United States” and explain their methodology.
Trina Sheets, executive director of the National Emergency Management Association, expressed concern about the unprecedented nature of this requirement. “It’s certainly not the responsibility of emergency management to certify population,” she noted. The situation has been further complicated by federal grant delays and policy shifts that create additional hurdles for state agencies.
States Scramble Amid Government Shutdown
With no clear guidance on how to calculate the revised population numbers and FEMA contacts furloughed during the federal shutdown, states have been left in limbo. Hawaii’s emergency management staff, for instance, scrambled to gather data from the 2020 census and other sources, then subtracted the number of “noncitizens” based on estimates from an advocacy group.
Bryan Koon, president and CEO of consulting firm IEM and former Florida emergency management chief, emphasized that state governments and local agencies need time to adjust their budgets to any changes. “An interruption in those services could place American lives in jeopardy,” he warned. These developments come amid broader industry developments that are reshaping how organizations approach risk management and preparedness.
Funding Cuts and Legal Challenges
In another move that has generated uncertainty, FEMA in September drastically cut some states’ allocations from the $1 billion Homeland Security Grant Program. New York received $100 million less than expected – a 79% reduction – while Illinois saw a 69% cut. Meanwhile, some territories received unexpected windfalls, including the U.S. Virgin Islands, which got more than twice its expected allocation.
The National Emergency Management Association stated that it “remains unclear what risk methodology was used” to determine the new funding allocation. Following legal challenges from Democratic states, a federal judge in Rhode Island issued a temporary restraining order on September 30, forcing FEMA to rescind award notifications and refrain from making payments until further court order.
Real-World Consequences for Disaster Response
In Hawaii, where a 2023 wildfire devastated the Maui town of Lahaina and killed more than 100 people, officials worry about the practical implications. The state, counties, and nonprofits “face the real possibility” of delays in paying contractors, completing projects, and “even staff furloughs or layoffs” if the grant freeze and government shutdown continue.
Washington state’s Emergency Management Division has paused filling some positions “out of an abundance of caution,” according to communications director Karina Shagren. These challenges are occurring alongside market trends that are affecting how organizations manage their resources and strategic planning.
Broader Implications for Emergency Preparedness
The Trump administration has suspended a $3.6 billion FEMA disaster resilience program, cut the FEMA workforce, and disrupted routine training – all while attempting to shift more responsibility to states and local governments for disaster response. Multiple lawsuits are further complicating decision-making, including one that ordered DHS and FEMA to restore $34 million in transit security grants withheld from New York City.
Frank Pace, administrator of the Hawaii Office of Homeland Security, noted that the freezes “underscore the uncertainty and political volatility surrounding these awards.” The turbulence is prompting states to reconsider their relationship with FEMA and explore ways to become less reliant on federal funding. As emergency managers navigate these challenges, they’re also monitoring related innovations that could potentially improve disaster response capabilities in the future.
Looking Ahead: States Forge New Paths
Given the ongoing uncertainties, states are increasingly exploring alternative funding mechanisms and building more resilient emergency management systems that can withstand federal funding fluctuations. The current crisis has highlighted the delicate balance between federal support and state autonomy in emergency preparedness, raising fundamental questions about how the nation should structure its disaster response infrastructure for the challenges ahead.
As Sheets of the National Emergency Management Association summarized, states are trying to find ways to be “less reliant on federal funding” – a significant shift in approach that could reshape emergency management in the United States for years to come.
This article aggregates information from publicly available sources. All trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective owners.
Note: Featured image is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent any specific product, service, or entity mentioned in this article.
