The Supreme Court has temporarily preserved Lisa Cook’s position on the Federal Reserve Board, rejecting the Trump administration’s emergency request to immediately remove the central bank governor. The unsigned order issued Wednesday means Cook will remain in her role while the court prepares to hear arguments in January about President Trump’s authority to fire Fed officials.
Unprecedented Challenge to Federal Reserve Independence
The legal battle represents the first time in the Federal Reserve’s 112-year history that a president has attempted to fire a sitting governor. Cook, appointed by President Biden in 2022, has vowed not to leave her position and resist what she calls bullying tactics. The case tests the boundaries of presidential power over independent agencies specifically designed to operate outside day-to-day political pressures.
Columbia Law School professor Lev Menand, author of “The Fed Unbound: The Crisis of Central Banking in a Divided America,” noted the court’s distinctive approach to this case compared to other independent agency disputes. “The court seems to be steering a different course here,” Menand observed. “It has the effect of freezing the status quo that is in favor of Fed independence.” The justices have previously allowed other presidential firings to take effect during legal challenges, including the case involving Rebecca Slaughter’s removal from the Federal Trade Commission.
Legal Arguments and Due Process Concerns
At the heart of the dispute lies the interpretation of the Federal Reserve Act’s “for cause” removal standard. U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb ruled that the administration failed to meet the legal requirement that Fed governors can only be fired for misconduct occurring during their tenure. Judge Cobb also determined that Trump’s firing would have deprived Cook of her due process rights to contest the dismissal.
The administration’s case relies heavily on allegations that Cook committed mortgage fraud before joining the Fed. Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued in court filings that “the President may reasonably determine that interest rates paid by the American people should not be set by a Governor who appears to have lied about facts material to the interest rates she secured for herself.” However, documents obtained by The Associated Press show Cook described her Atlanta condo as a “vacation home” in loan documents and as a “2nd home” in security clearance forms, potentially undermining fraud allegations.
Immediate Impact on Monetary Policy
The court’s decision ensures Cook will participate in the remaining two Federal Reserve meetings of 2025, including the critical late October session of the Federal Open Market Committee. This maintains the current balance on the rate-setting panel at a time of significant economic uncertainty. Cook voted with the majority in September’s decision to lower interest rates by a quarter percentage point, while newly confirmed Fed Governor Stephen Miran cast the sole dissenting vote in favor of a larger cut.
The timing of the administration’s legal push—seeking Cook’s removal before the September meeting—underscores the high stakes of Fed governance during a presidential election cycle. With inflation concerns persisting and economic growth slowing, the composition of the Fed board directly influences interest rates that affect everything from mortgage costs to business investment. The Federal Reserve’s dual mandate of price stability and maximum employment now plays out against this unprecedented political backdrop.
Broader Implications for Government Accountability
This case intersects with a separate Supreme Court challenge scheduled for December arguments concerning Trump’s authority to fire members of other independent agency boards. That case will address whether federal judges can prevent such firings or are limited to ordering back pay for wrongly dismissed officials. The outcomes of both cases could redefine the balance of power between the executive branch and independent agencies.
White House spokesman Kush Desai maintained the administration’s position, stating: “President Trump lawfully removed Lisa Cook for cause from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. We look forward to ultimate victory after presenting our oral arguments before the Supreme Court in January.” Cook’s legal team responded that the court’s decision “rightly allows Governor Cook to continue in her role on the Federal Reserve Board, and we look forward to further proceedings consistent with the Court’s order.”
References: